A Medical study produced by Harvard medical School in association with the Karolinsks Institute in Sweden has been printed. Faculty of Iceland, Reykjavik and a number of Boston hospitals, have my dander up today. The end result of this study is: “prostate cancer brings up the immediate risks of suicide and aerobic death,” it said. The scientists found that the chance was particularly large within the very first month after a breast cancer diagnosis.
What has my ire increased is the study helps make nary a mention of what treatment action was taken by the medical community in the month or year immediately after the examination of prostate cancer. That leads me to “The Prostate Express.” Each year, 100 American males travel to Germany to undergo hypothermia therapy for prostate cancer. The American health care industry is dominated by radiation and chemotherapy, and hyperthermia doesn’t have severe negative effects.
In my opinion, treatment for prostate cancer has far greater effect on suicide and cardiovascular deaths compared to a diagnosis of cancer. However when I discuss green living very large study (linked at the conclusion) there’s complete silence about the cancer solutions accompanied by the study’s individuals. Here is an example of the present state of prostate health care in America. Call him Bill, our blended American patient. Bill has his annual checkup from his doctor. He receives a prostate specific antigen (PSA) test and the well – known digital finger wag evaluation together with his visit.
Once the PSA test returns with a reading of 7.0, Bill is seen by a urologist. The urologist provides Bill another PSA test, an additional test of the finger wag. Based on these findings, the urologist performs a needle biopsy known as a “punch test,” in which half a dozen core samples are collected from Bill’s prostate gland. Bill stated when the lab results returned, wakame he was informed that cancer cells were present in 4 of 6 tissue samples.
Additionally, the pathologist who performed the laboratory work for Bill assigned a five Gleason rating. (The Gleason score is highly subjective with hand counts of cancer cells, a view on their differentiation from normal prostate cells, and an opinion on the colors which cancer cells ingest the tested tissue samples.) Right after obtaining the pathologists laboratory report the urologist schedules Bill for a different session. He informs Bill that the results are in line with prostate cancer. The urologist suggests that Bill have a major prostatectomy, which would eliminate the whole prostate gland.
Bill Bill vaguely remembers reading that he could lose command of his urinary tasks and his sex life will change. But Bill really hears, “If we go in now, we should be able to get all.” And, “if we remove it right away your chances of survival are ninety % plus”. Therefore Bill, a normal American male, scared to death or perhaps the possibility of dying, says “Get’er Done.” Only after the procedure does Bill recognize the importance of what he didn’t hear distinctly. “You is going to lose command of your urinary function,” and “sexual job is likely to be virtually gone”.
One year down the road, Bill continues to be wearing a diaper. He merely needs one diaper per day some days, and another he employs far more often. Bill’s wife moved out 6 months ago as well as the divorce was final last week. Stimulating photos had been tried on Bill’s penis, however it didn’t work. He does not yet resolve to be a monk as well as fantasizes about the possibility of a penal implant.
Now back to Harvard’s Prostate research as well as the subject of my post, “The prostate Express.” Where did the data from the analysis originate from? What procedures did the prostate individuals undergo? Which individuals had a major prostectomy? Who were the people who received radiation? Which cancer sufferers have had chemotherapy? Which patients have been provided various combinations? No one of the crucial treatment data is presented or talked about in the current study. We aren’t advised of patients who decided to do absolutely nothing and then refused to get traditional treatments. No longer are we educated of those patients which chose integrative or alternative treatments and chose to travel abroad for various remedies in Germany, Italy, Japan, etc.